Opinion · Nylaw New York

BAUM v. ALTMAN, 200 A.D.2d 486 [1st Dept 1994]

JEROME S. BAUM, Respondent, v. MELVIN ALTMAN et al., Appellants., 608 N.Y.S.2d 813 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1994)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1994-01-20
Topic: general

BAUM v. ALTMAN, 200 A.D.2d 486 [1st Dept 1994] 608 N.Y.S.2d 813 JEROME S. BAUM, Respondent, v. MELVIN ALTMAN et al., Appellants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. January 20, 1994 Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BAUM v. ALTMAN, 200 A.D.2d 486 [1st Dept 1994]. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BAUM v. ALTMAN,200 A.D.2d 486[1st Dept 1994]

608 N.Y.S.2d 813

JEROME S. BAUM, Respondent, v. MELVIN ALTMAN et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

January 20, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H. Arber, J.).

The IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff's motion to amend his ad damnum clause, there being no showing of prejudice. Plaintiff's actual damages may also include the cost of the bankruptcy petition.

Concur — Murphy, P.J, Carro, Asch and Kupferman, JJ.