Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Santoro v. Mirschel
Santoro v. Mirschel, 59 N.Y.S.2d 279 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 1945)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1945-12-10
- Topic
- antitrust
Order dismissing on the merits appellant’s petition for an order under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act directing respondents, constituting the Board of Trustees of the Village of Hempstead, to issue to appellant a license for the year 1945 to conduct a restaurant,, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present -— Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ. [184 Misc. 666.]
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Santoro v. Mirschel. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Order dismissing on the merits appellant’s petition for an order under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act directing respondents, constituting the Board of Trustees of the Village of Hempstead, to issue to appellant a license for the year 1945 to conduct a restaurant,, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present -— Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ. [184 Misc. 666.]