Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
People v. Santiago
80 N.Y.2d 916
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1992-09-17
- Topic
- general
OPINION OF THE COURT On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, the People’s contention with respect to sentencing was not advanced at a time sufficient to preserve the issue for this Court’s review. Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Santiago. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 6 opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, the People’s contention with respect to sentencing was not advanced at a time sufficient to preserve the issue for this Court’s review.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.