Opinion · Nylaw New York

BIKOWITZ v. NEDCO PHARMACY, INC., HINES, 68 N.Y.2d 641 (1986)

MARILYN BIKOWITZ et al., Appellants, v. NEDCO PHARMACY, INC., et al.,Defendants, & ELEONORE HINSE, Respondent., 505 N.Y.S.2d 72 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1986)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1986-06-05
Topic: general

BIKOWITZ v. NEDCO PHARMACY, INC., HINES, 68 N.Y.2d 641 (1986) 505 N.Y.S.2d 72, 496 N.E.2d 231 MARILYN BIKOWITZ et al., Appellants, v. NEDCO PHARMACY, INC., et al.,Defendants, and ELEONORE HINSE, Respondent.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted April 14, 1986 Decided June 5, 1986 Motion for leave to appeal dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements, upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 20, 81-84, at 84).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BIKOWITZ v. NEDCO PHARMACY, INC., HINES, 68 N.Y.2d 641 (1986). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BIKOWITZ v. NEDCO PHARMACY, INC., HINES,68 N.Y.2d 641(1986)

505 N.Y.S.2d 72,496 N.E.2d 231

MARILYN BIKOWITZ et al., Appellants, v. NEDCO PHARMACY, INC., et al.,

Defendants, and ELEONORE HINSE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted April 14, 1986

Decided June 5, 1986

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements, upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 20, 81-84, at 84).