Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

People v. Fuce

117 A.D.2d 616

Type
Opinion
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1986-02-03
Topic
general

—Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), both rendered November 7, 1983, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under *617indictment No. 846/83, and attempted burglary in the third degree under indictment No. 1303/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Judgments affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Fuce. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

—Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), both rendered November 7, 1983, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under *617 indictment No. 846/83, and attempted burglary in the third degree under indictment No. 1303/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.