Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
In re the Arbitration between Delaware Valley Central School District & Delaware Valley Faculty Ass'n
54 N.Y.2d 613
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1981-06-16
- Topic
- international-arbitration
OPINION OF THE COURT On summary consideration, order reversed, with costs, and the applications to stay arbitration denied. It does not alter the classification of articles XXV(F), XXV(E) and III (A) as “substantive” provisions of the contract that their interpretation will determine the duration of the agreement to arbitrate. They are nonetheless “provisions of the agreement” other than the arbitration clause itself and as such are the proper subject of a grievance, and thus of arbitration within the explicit agreement of the parties. (Matter of Windsor Cent. School Dist. v Windsor Teachers Assn., 52 NY2d 734.) Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re the Arbitration between Delaware Valley Central School District & Delaware Valley Faculty Ass'n. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order reversed, with costs, and the applications to stay arbitration denied. It does not alter the classification of articles XXV(F), XXV(E) and III (A) as “substantive” provisions of the contract that their interpretation will determine the duration of the agreement to arbitrate. They are nonetheless “provisions of the agreement” other than the arbitration clause itself and as such are the proper subject of a grievance, and thus of arbitration within the explicit agreement of the parties. (Matter of Windsor Cent. School Dist. v Windsor Teachers Assn., 52 NY2d 734.)
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.