Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Hum. Rts. Appeal Bd., 61 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York 1978)

Type
Opinion
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1978-03-13
Topic
general

Consolidated proceedings pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review two orders of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated April 22, 1977 and July 6, *10111977, respectively, which, inter alia, affirmed separate orders of the State Commissioner of Human Rights declaring that petitioner’s policy of mandatory, unpaid pregnancy leave constituted unlawful sex discrimination in violation of section 296 of the Executive Law. Orders confirmed and petitions dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The determinations under review are supported by sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole (see Executive Law, § 298). Latham, J. P., Damiani, Gulotta, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United Air Lines, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions

Consolidated proceedings pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review two orders of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated April 22, 1977 and July 6, *1011 1977, respectively, which, inter alia, affirmed separate orders of the State Commissioner of Human Rights declaring that petitioner’s policy of mandatory, unpaid pregnancy leave constituted unlawful sex discrimination in violation of section 296 of the Executive Law. Orders confirmed and petitions dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The determinations under review are supported by sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole (see Executive Law, § 298). Latham, J. P., Damiani, Gulotta, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.