Opinion · Nylaw New York

SIMPKINS v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 33 N.Y.2d 1010 (1974)

SIMEON SIMPKINS, Appellant, v. CITY OF N.Y. et al., Respondents., 353 N.Y.S.2d 969 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1974)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1974-02-14
Topic: general

SIMPKINS v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 33 N.Y.2d 1010 (1974) 353 N.Y.S.2d 969, 309 N.E.2d 430 SIMEON SIMPKINS, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted January 21, 1974 Decided February 14, 1974 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MARTIN B. STECHER, J. Simeon Simpkins, pro se, for application.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SIMPKINS v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 33 N.Y.2d 1010 (1974). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SIMPKINSv.CITY OF NEW YORK,33 N.Y.2d 1010(1974)

353 N.Y.S.2d 969,309 N.E.2d 430

SIMEON SIMPKINS, Appellant,v.CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted January 21, 1974

Decided February 14, 1974

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MARTIN B. STECHER, J.

Simeon Simpkins, pro se,for application.

No one opposed.

Application, considered as one for leave to appeal, dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.Page 1011