Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
People v. Kvalheim
17 N.Y.2d 510
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1966-01-20
- Topic
- intellectual-property-and-technology
Order affirmed. Dismissal of the complaint (instead of remission for a new arraignment) was proper here since defendant had already served his sentence of imprisonment (People v. Witenski, 15 N Y 2d 392). Since appellant appeals from that part only of the order which dismisses the complaint we make no determination as to the correctness of so much of the Appellate Term decision as holds that defendant was not properly informed of his rights. Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Vooehis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed People v. Kvalheim. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 6 opinions
Order affirmed. Dismissal of the complaint (instead of remission for a new arraignment) was proper here since defendant had already served his sentence of imprisonment (People v. Witenski, 15 N Y 2d 392). Since appellant appeals from that part only of the order which dismisses the complaint we make no determination as to the correctness of so much of the Appellate Term decision as holds that defendant was not properly informed of his rights.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Vooehis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating.