Opinion · Nylaw New York

GROSSMAN v. JANETTE H. CORPORATION, 14 N.Y.2d 852 (1964)

251 N.Y.S.2d 966

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1964-06-10
Topic: general

GROSSMAN v. JANETTE H. CORPORATION, 14 N.Y.2d 852 (1964) 251 N.Y.S.2d 966, 200 N.E.2d 632 SYLVIA GROSSMAN, Appellant, v. JANETTE H. CORPORATION, Defendant, andCAROLINE JANESKI, Respondent.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued June 4, 1964 Decided June 10, 1964 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ARTHUR G.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed GROSSMAN v. JANETTE H. CORPORATION, 14 N.Y.2d 852 (1964). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

GROSSMANv.JANETTE H. CORPORATION,14 N.Y.2d 852(1964)

251 N.Y.S.2d 966,200 N.E.2d 632

SYLVIA GROSSMAN, Appellant,v.JANETTE H. CORPORATION, Defendant, and

CAROLINE JANESKI, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued June 4, 1964

Decided June 10, 1964

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ARTHUR G. KLEIN, J.Page 853

Milton SomerfieldandMichael J. Kunstlerfor appellant.Leo Lambert Waltonfor respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and SCILEPPI. Taking no part: Judge BERGAN.