Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

In re the Estate of Rosenfield

18 A.D.2d 718

Type: Opinion
Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1962-12-26
Topic: real-estate

How later courts describe this case

“A transfer made with actual intent to defraud is fraudulent as to both present and future creditors.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re the Estate of Rosenfield. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

In a proceeding by *719 testator’s widow to compel the executors .to honor her claim (No. 2) to the testator’s real and personal property, pursuant to a written agreement dated April 26, 1943, such proceeding having been consolidated with a proceeding by the executors to judicially settle their intermediate account, the widow appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Westhcester County, dated March 27, 1961, which dismissed her said claim No. 2. Order affirmed, with costs to all respondents filing briefs, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.