Opinion · Nylaw New York

GLUCK v. LONDON LANCASHIRE IND. CO. OF AMERICA, 2 N.Y.2d 953 (1957)

162 N.Y.S.2d 357

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1957-04-04
Topic: general

GLUCK v. LONDON LANCASHIRE IND. CO. OF AMERICA, 2 N.Y.2d 953 (1957) 162 N.Y.S.2d 357, 142 N.E.2d 423 HELEN GLUCK, as Administratrix of the Estate of CARL GLUCK, Deceased,Respondent, v. LONDON LANCASHIRE INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA,Appellant.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued February 27, 1957 Decided April 4, 1957 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, A.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed GLUCK v. LONDON LANCASHIRE IND. CO. OF AMERICA, 2 N.Y.2d 953 (1957). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

GLUCKv.LONDON LANCASHIRE IND. CO. OF AMERICA,2 N.Y.2d 953(1957)

162 N.Y.S.2d 357,142 N.E.2d 423

HELEN GLUCK, as Administratrix of the Estate of CARL GLUCK, Deceased,

Respondent,v.LONDON LANCASHIRE INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA,

Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 27, 1957

Decided April 4, 1957

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, A. DAVID BENJAMIN, J.Page 954

Joseph KaneandEdward Pacellifor appellant.Nathaniel Rothsteinfor respondent.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against defendant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts. No opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL and BURKE, JJ. VAN VOORHIS, J., dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that recovery is precluded by failure to give written notice of loss as required by the terms of the insurance policy.