Opinion · Nylaw New York

GLUCK v. LONDON LANCASHIRE IND. CO. OF AMERICA, 2 N.Y.2d 953 (1957)

HELEN GLUCK, as Adm’r, Adm’x of the Est. of CARL GLUCK, Deceased,Respondent, v. LONDON LANCASHIRE Indem. Co. OF AMERICA,Appellant., 162 N.Y.S.2d 357 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1957)

Type
Opinion
Court
New York
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1957-04-04
Topic
general

GLUCK v. LONDON LANCASHIRE IND. CO. OF AMERICA, 2 N.Y.2d 953 (1957) 162 N.Y.S.2d 357, 142 N.E.2d 423 HELEN GLUCK, as Administratrix of the Estate of CARL GLUCK, Deceased,Respondent, v. LONDON LANCASHIRE INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA,Appellant.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued February 27, 1957 Decided April 4, 1957 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, A.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed GLUCK v. LONDON LANCASHIRE IND. CO. OF AMERICA, 2 N.Y.2d 953 (1957). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

GLUCKv.LONDON LANCASHIRE IND. CO. OF AMERICA,2 N.Y.2d 953(1957)
162 N.Y.S.2d 357,142 N.E.2d 423
HELEN GLUCK, as Administratrix of the Estate of CARL GLUCK, Deceased,
Respondent,v.LONDON LANCASHIRE INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA,
Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Argued February 27, 1957
Decided April 4, 1957
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, A. DAVID BENJAMIN, J.Page 954
Joseph KaneandEdward Pacellifor appellant.Nathaniel Rothsteinfor respondent.
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against defendant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts. No opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL and BURKE, JJ. VAN VOORHIS, J., dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that recovery is precluded by failure to give written notice of loss as required by the terms of the insurance policy.