Opinion · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Ferrara v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
102 N.Y.S.2d 451
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1951-01-30
- Topic
- litigation
The facts not being within the knowledge of plaintiff, she is entitled to have the statements contained in the moving affidavits submitted to the test of cross-examination. Determination of the Appellate Term and judgment of the City Court of the City of New York, New York County, entered thereon unanimously reversed, with costs to the plaintiff-appellant, and *562the order of the City Court of the City of New York denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment affirmed. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See post, p. 684.]
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ferrara v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
The facts not being within the knowledge of plaintiff, she is entitled to have the statements contained in the moving affidavits submitted to the test of cross-examination. Determination of the Appellate Term and judgment of the City Court of the City of New York, New York County, entered thereon unanimously reversed, with costs to the plaintiff-appellant, and