Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Pordum v. State

Pordum v. State, 67 N.Y.2d 770 (New York Court of Appeals 1986)

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1986-03-18
Topic
general

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (112 AD2d 717). *772Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander. Taking no part: Hancock, Jr.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pordum v. State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (112 AD2d 717).

*772 Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander. Taking no part: Hancock, Jr.