Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Steinhardt v. Johns-Manville Corp.
Steinhardt v. Johns-Manville Corp., 55 N.Y.2d 802 (New York Court of Appeals 1981)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1981-12-22
- Topic
- labor-and-employment
Motion by plaintiff Steinhardt to amend the remittitur granted, return of the remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of .the United States, viz.: Whether the holding that the plaintiff’s causes of action accrued and the Statutes of Limitations commenced when the employment-related exposure to asbestos particles occurred deprived plaintiff of due process of law. On the court’s own motion, in Rosenberg et al., return of the remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the holding that the plaintiffs’ causes of action accrued and the Statutes of Limitations commenced when the employment-related exposure to asbestos particles occurred deprived plaintiffs of due process of law. [See 54 NY2d 1008.]
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Steinhardt v. Johns-Manville Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
Motion by plaintiff Steinhardt to amend the remittitur granted, return of the remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of .the United States, viz.: Whether the holding that the plaintiff’s causes of action accrued and the Statutes of Limitations commenced when the employment-related exposure to asbestos particles occurred deprived plaintiff of due process of law.
On the court’s own motion, in Rosenberg et al., return of the remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the holding that the plaintiffs’ causes of action accrued and the Statutes of Limitations commenced when the employment-related exposure to asbestos particles occurred deprived plaintiffs of due process of law. [See 54 NY2d 1008.]