Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Pauk v. Board of Higher Education
Pauk v. Bd. of Higher Educ., 48 N.Y.2d 930 (New York Court of Appeals 1979)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1979-12-13
- Topic
- international-arbitration
OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice Vincent A. Lupiano at the Appellate Division (62 AD2d 660), to which we add only that even if we accepted petitioner’s theory of estoppel the record does not establish that petitioner lacked the means of knowledge of what section 6206 (subd 3, par b) (now § 6212, subd 3, par b) of the Education Law provided. Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pauk v. Board of Higher Education. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice Vincent A. Lupiano at the Appellate Division (62 AD2d 660), to which we add only that even if we accepted petitioner’s theory of estoppel the record does not establish that petitioner lacked the means of knowledge of what section 6206 (subd 3, par b) (now § 6212, subd 3, par b) of the Education Law provided.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.