Opinion · Nylaw New York
STEELEY v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 3 N.Y.2d 930 (1957)
MOSES STEELEY, Appellant, v. CITY OF N.Y., Respondent & Third-PartyPlaintiff-Respondent. BELPARK Constr. CORP., Third-PartyDefendant-Respondent., 3 N.Y.2d 930 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1957)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1957-10-17
- Topic
- general
STEELEY v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 3 N.Y.2d 930 (1957) MOSES STEELEY, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent and Third-PartyPlaintiff-Respondent. BELPARK CONSTRUCTION CORP., Third-PartyDefendant-Respondent.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted October 7, 1957 Decided October 17, 1957 Motion for leave to prosecute appeal as a poor person granted.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STEELEY v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 3 N.Y.2d 930 (1957). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
STEELEYv.CITY OF NEW YORK,3 N.Y.2d 930(1957)
MOSES STEELEY, Appellant,v.CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent and Third-Party
Plaintiff-Respondent. BELPARK CONSTRUCTION CORP., Third-Party
Defendant-Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Submitted October 7, 1957
Decided October 17, 1957