Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz
304 N.Y. 590
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1952-05-29
- Topic
- general
Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended to read as follows: Judgments reversed, counterclaim dismissed and judgment directed to be entered in favor of plaintiff, Joseph D. Van Valkenburgh, for the relief prayed for in the complaint subject to the existing easement. (Lutz v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended to read as follows: Judgments reversed, counterclaim dismissed and judgment directed to be entered in favor of plaintiff, Joseph D. Van Valkenburgh, for the relief prayed for in the complaint subject to the existing easement. (Lutz v. Van Valkenburgh, 274 App. Div. 813), with costs in all courts. [See 304 N. Y. 95.]