Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF FELT TARRANT MFG. CO. v. McGOLDRICK, 280 N.Y. 688 (1939)

In the Matter of FELT TARRANT MFG. CO., Respondent, against JOSEPH D.McGOLDRICK, as Comptroller of the City of N.Y., Appellant., 280 N.Y. 688 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1939)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1939-04-11
Topic: general

MATTER OF FELT TARRANT MFG. CO. v. McGOLDRICK, 280 N.Y. 688 (1939) In the Matter of FELT TARRANT MFG. CO., Respondent, against JOSEPH D.McGOLDRICK, as Comptroller of the City of New York, Appellant.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted April 3, 1939 Decided April 11, 1939 Motion for reargument denied and motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto after the words "upon the authority of Matter of National Cash RegisterCo. v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF FELT TARRANT MFG. CO. v. McGOLDRICK, 280 N.Y. 688 (1939). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF FELT TARRANT MFG. CO. v. McGOLDRICK,280 N.Y. 688(1939)

In the Matter of FELT TARRANT MFG. CO., Respondent, against JOSEPH D.

McGOLDRICK, as Comptroller of the City of New York, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted April 3, 1939

Decided April 11, 1939

Motion for reargument denied and motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested andPage 689when returned it will be amended by adding thereto after the words "upon the authority ofMatter of National Cash RegisterCo.v.Taylor(276 N.Y. 208)" the following: "and upon the sole ground that the City Sales Tax Law as here applied violates the commerce clause (article 1, section 8, clause 3) of the Constitution of the United States." (See279 N.Y. 678.)