Opinion · Nylaw New York

THE FARMERS' LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY v. SCHULZE, 237 N.Y. 626 (1924)

FARMERS' LOAN & Tr. Co., as Tr. under a Deed of Tr. Madeby EDWARD SCHULZE et al., Respondents, v. DAISY E. SCHULZE, Respondent,and OLLIE B. STRONG et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others., 237 N.Y. 626 (Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 1924)

Type: Opinion
Court: New York
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1924-01-01
Topic: general

THE FARMERS' LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY v. SCHULZE, 237 N.Y. 626 (1924) THE FARMERS' LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee under a Deed of Trust Madeby EDWARD SCHULZE et al., Respondents, v. DAISY E. SCHULZE, Respondent,and OLLIE B. STRONG et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued February 27, 1924 Decided April 1, 1924 Richard E.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed THE FARMERS' LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY v. SCHULZE, 237 N.Y. 626 (1924). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

THE FARMERS' LOAN AND TRUST COMPANYv. SCHULZE,237 N.Y. 626(1924)

THE FARMERS' LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee under a Deed of Trust Made

by EDWARD SCHULZE et al., Respondents,v. DAISY E. SCHULZE, Respondent,

and OLLIE B. STRONG et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 27, 1924

Decided April 1, 1924

Page 627

Richard E. WeldonandRandolph Sailerfor appellants.Herbert Noble, Alex M. De Haven, Hartwell P. HeathandJamesH. Kirkpatrickfor respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ.