Opinion · New York Court of Appeals

Fischer v. . Wabash Railway Company

235 N.Y. 568

Type
Opinion
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction
New York
Date
1923-03-20
Topic
general

Order affirmed, with costs; first, third, fourth and fifth questions certified answered in the negative; second question not answered; no opinion. Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, J. Taking no part: McLaughlin, J.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Fischer v. . Wabash Railway Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions

Order affirmed, with costs; first, third, fourth and fifth questions certified answered in the negative; second question not answered; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, J. Taking no part: McLaughlin, J.