Opinion · New York Court of Appeals
People Ex Rel. Choate v. . Barrett
121 N.Y. 678
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1890-05-09
- Topic
- general
Agree to affirm; no opinion. All concur except Earl and Pinch, JJ., who dissent upon the ground that the misconduct of the appellant was not within “the immediate view and presence of the court,” as stated in the Code of Civil Procedure. Order affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed People Ex Rel. Choate v. . Barrett. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 16 opinions
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur except Earl and Pinch, JJ., who dissent upon the ground that the misconduct of the appellant was not within “the immediate view and presence of the court,” as stated in the Code of Civil Procedure.Order affirmed.