Opinion · Milaw Michigan
ARRINGTON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 140480 (Mich. 3-17-2010)
ANTHONY LEE ARRINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dep’t OFCORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee., 779 N.W.2d 250 (Mich. 2010)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Milaw Michigan
- Jurisdiction
- Milaw
- Date
- 2010-03-17
- Topic
- general
ARRINGTON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 140480 (Mich. 3-17-2010) 779 N.W.2d 250 ANTHONY LEE ARRINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OFCORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 140480.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 17, 2010.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed ARRINGTON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 140480 (Mich. 3-17-2010). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
ARRINGTON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 140480 (Mich. 3-17-2010)
779 N.W.2d 250
ANTHONY LEE ARRINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 140480.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
March 17, 2010.
Page 1
SC: 140480, COA: 294393
On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the partial filing fee as required by the order of February 2, 2010, the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close this file.