Opinion · Michigan Supreme Court
HARTMAN & EICHHORN BUILDING COMPANY, INC. v. Dailey
474 Mich. 1132
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Michigan Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Michigan
- Date
- 2006-05-04
- Topic
- general
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan May 4, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 129733 Michael F. Cavanagh & (79) Elizabeth A. Weaver (80) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed HARTMAN & EICHHORN BUILDING COMPANY, INC. v. Dailey. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
HARTMAN & EICHHORN BUILDING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff/Counter Defendant,
v.
Steven DAILEY and Janine Dailey, Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs/Appellees, and
George H. Presley, and ABN-AMRO, d/b/a Standard Federal Bank, Defendants, and
Jeffry R. Hartman, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Docket Nos. 129733 & (79)(80). COA No. 249847.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 4, 2006.On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file briefs amicus curiae are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the questions involving the Michigan Consumer Protection Act's application to residential builders. We further ORDER that this case be argued and submitted to the Court together with the case of Liss v. Lewiston Richards, Inc., 474 Mich. 1133, 712 N.W.2d 724 (2006), at such future session of the Court as both cases are ready for submission.