Opinion · Milaw Michigan
PEOPLE v. POINDEXTER, 474 Mich. 931 (2005)
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF Mich., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CESPREGIPOINDEXTER, Defendant-Appellant., 706 N.W.2d 23 (Mich. 2005)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Milaw Michigan
- Jurisdiction
- Milaw
- Date
- 2005-11-29
- Topic
- general
PEOPLE v. POINDEXTER, 474 Mich. 931 (2005) 706 N.W.2d 23 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CESPREGIPOINDEXTER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 127867 (15).Supreme Court of Michigan. November 29, 2005.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PEOPLE v. POINDEXTER, 474 Mich. 931 (2005). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PEOPLE v. POINDEXTER,474 Mich. 931(2005)
706 N.W.2d 23
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CESPREGI
POINDEXTER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 127867 (15).
Supreme Court of Michigan.
November 29, 2005.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 3, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to remand is also considered, and it is DENIED.
KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance forPeople v.Drohan, lv gtd472 Mich 881(2005).