Opinion · Michigan Supreme Court
Dean v. Childs
Dean v. Childs, 474 Mich. 914 (Mich. 2005)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Michigan Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Michigan
- Date
- 2005-11-03
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- reversing denial of summary judgment for defendants, for reasons stated by dissenting opinion in Dean v. Childs, 262 Mich.App. 48, 684 N.W.2d 894, 901-03 (2004)
- reversing denial of summary judgment for defendants, for reasons stated by dissenting opinion in Dean v. Childs, 684 N.W.2d 894, 901-03 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004)
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dean v. Childs. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 13 opinions
Marie DEAN, Personal Representative of the Estates of Taleigha Marie Dean, Deceased, Aaron John Dean, Deceased, Craig Logan Dean, Deceased, and Eugene Sylvester, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jeffrey CHILDS, Defendant-Appellant, and
Charter Township of Royal Oak, Defendant.
Docket Nos. 126393 & (49)(51). COA No. 244627.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
November 3, 2005.On October 18, 2005, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave *345 to appeal the May 13, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, for the reasons stated by dissenting Court of Appeals Judge Griffin, we REVERSE in part the Court of Appeals judgment and REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for entry of an order granting defendant Childs' motion for summary disposition of plaintiff's state law claims.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., dissents from this Court's peremptory reversal order and would grant leave to appeal.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.