Opinion · Milaw Michigan

IN RE ESTATE OF MARCHYOK, 474 Mich. 880 (2005)

In re Est. OF JANIS MARCHYOK, Deceased, KATHARINE MARCHYOK & DELORESFOSTER, Co-Personal Representatives of the Est. OF JANIS MARCHYOK, andDOUGLAS MARCHYOK, Next Friend of PATRICK MARCHYOK, MICHAEL MARCHYOK andRICHARD FOSTER, minors, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF ANN ARBOR,Defendant-Appellee., 704 N.W.2d 465 (Mich. 2005)

Type: Opinion
Court: Milaw Michigan
Jurisdiction: Milaw
Date: 2005-10-13
Topic: general

IN RE ESTATE OF MARCHYOK, 474 Mich. 880 (2005) 704 N.W.2d 465 In re ESTATE OF JANIS MARCHYOK, Deceased, KATHARINE MARCHYOK and DELORESFOSTER, Co-Personal Representatives of the ESTATE OF JANIS MARCHYOK, andDOUGLAS MARCHYOK, Next Friend of PATRICK MARCHYOK, MICHAEL MARCHYOK andRICHARD FOSTER, minors, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF ANN ARBOR,Defendant-Appellee. No. 125900.Supreme Court of Michigan. October 13, 2005. SC: 125900, COA: 242409, Washtenaw CC: 01-000279-CZ.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed IN RE ESTATE OF MARCHYOK, 474 Mich. 880 (2005). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

IN RE ESTATE OF MARCHYOK,474 Mich. 880(2005)

704 N.W.2d 465

In re ESTATE OF JANIS MARCHYOK, Deceased, KATHARINE MARCHYOK and DELORES

FOSTER, Co-Personal Representatives of the ESTATE OF JANIS MARCHYOK, and

DOUGLAS MARCHYOK, Next Friend of PATRICK MARCHYOK, MICHAEL MARCHYOK and

RICHARD FOSTER, minors, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF ANN ARBOR,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 125900.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 13, 2005.

SC: 125900, COA: 242409, Washtenaw CC: 01-000279-CZ.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 24, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH and Kelly, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.