Opinion · Milaw Michigan
PEOPLE v. TATE, 123641 (Mich. 2003)
670 N.W.2d 226
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Milaw Michigan
- Jurisdiction
- Milaw
- Date
- 2003-10-10
- Topic
- general
PEOPLE v. TATE, 123641 (Mich. 2003) 670 N.W.2d 226 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DELEON D. TATE,Defendant-Appellant. No. 123641.Supreme Court of Michigan.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PEOPLE v. TATE, 123641 (Mich. 2003). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PEOPLE v. TATE, 123641 (Mich. 2003)
670 N.W.2d 226
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DELEON D. TATE,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 123641.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
October 10, 2003.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 18, 2003, judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the defendant's application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. Specifically, the Prosecuting Attorney is invited to address whether the defendant has sufficiently challenged the voluntary nature of the typewritten statement to police that was introduced at trial, and whether the Court of Appeals decision in this case was erroneous in light ofLeev. Mississippi,332 U.S. 742(1948), andBoles v. Stevenson,379 U.S. 43(1964).
The application for leave to appeal remains pending.