Opinion · Milaw Michigan

RUIZ v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORPORATION, 463 Mich. 878 (2000)

REINALDO RUIZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION,Defendant-Appellant., 618 N.W.2d 596 (Mich. 2000)

Type: Opinion
Court: Milaw Michigan
Jurisdiction: Milaw
Date: 2000-09-26
Topic: general

RUIZ v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORPORATION, 463 Mich. 878 (2000) 618 N.W.2d 596 REINALDO RUIZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION,Defendant-Appellant. No. 116766.Supreme Court of Michigan. September 26, 2000.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed RUIZ v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORPORATION, 463 Mich. 878 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

RUIZ v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORPORATION,463 Mich. 878(2000)

618 N.W.2d 596

REINALDO RUIZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 116766.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 26, 2000.

COA: 223748, Michigan, WCAC: 97-0376.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the April 3, 2000, decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.