Opinion · Wilaw Wisconsin

STATE v. AMERITECH CORP., 193 Wis.2d 150 (1995)

STATE of Wis., Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. AMERITECHCORPORATION, Household Bank, N.A. & Household Credit Servs., Inc.,foreign Corps. & Wis. Bell, Inc., a domestic corporation,Defendants-Respondents., 532 N.W.2d 449 (Wis. 1995)

Type
Opinion
Court
Wilaw Wisconsin
Jurisdiction
Wilaw
Date
1995-06-01
Topic
general

STATE v. AMERITECH CORP., 193 Wis.2d 150 (1995) 532 N.W.2d 449 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. AMERITECHCORPORATION, Household Bank, N.A. and Household Credit Services, Inc.,foreign corporations and Wisconsin Bell, Inc., a domestic corporation,Defendants-Respondents.Supreme Court of Wisconsin. No. 93-1750.Oral argument March 7, 1995. — Decided June 1, 1995. (Affirming 185 Wis.2d 686, 517 N.W.2d 705 (Ct.App. 1994).) REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals affirming an order of the Circuit Court for Dane county, MARK A.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. AMERITECH CORP., 193 Wis.2d 150 (1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. AMERITECH CORP.,193 Wis.2d 150(1995)
532 N.W.2d 449
STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. AMERITECH
CORPORATION, Household Bank, N.A. and Household Credit Services, Inc.,
foreign corporations and Wisconsin Bell, Inc., a domestic corporation,
Defendants-Respondents.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
No. 93-1750.
Oral argument March 7, 1995.—
Decided June 1, 1995.
(Affirming185 Wis.2d 686,517 N.W.2d 705(Ct.App. 1994).)Page 151
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals affirming an order of the Circuit Court for Dane county, MARK A. FRANKEL, Judge.Affirmed.
For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner the cause was argued byDavid J. Gilles, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs wereJames D. Jeffries, assistant attorney general,David J. Gilles, assistant attorney general andJames E. Doyle, attorney general.

For the defendants-respondents there was a combined brief byJohn R. DawsonandFoley Lardner, Milwaukee;Daniel W. Hildebrand, Dennis P. BirkeandRoss Stevens, S.C., Madison andRonald J.Greene, Marc R. CohenandWilmer, Cutler Pickeringof Washington, D.C. and oral argument byDaniel W.Hildebrand.

Amicus curiae brief was filed byCurtis A. Witynski, Legal Counsel, Madison for the League of Wisconsin Municipalities.

Amicus curiae brief was filed byD.J. WeisandHabush, Habush, Davis Rottier, S.C., Rhinelander for the Wisconsin Academy of Trial Lawyers.
PER CURIAM.
The court is equally divided on the question of whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the court of appeals. Justice STEINMETZ, Justice WILCOX, and Justice GESKE would affirm; Chief Justice HEFFERNAN, Justice DAY, and Justice BABLITCH would reverse. Justice Abrahamson did not participate.

Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.Page 152