Opinion · Wisconsin Supreme Court

Ganzer v. Rosenfeld

Ganzer v. Rosenfeld, 153 Wis. 442 (Wis. 1913)

Type
Opinion
Court
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Wisconsin
Date
1913-04-29
Topic
general

Winslow, C. J. This is an appeal from an order overruling a general demurrer to the complaint. The only serious question involved is whether stockholders and creditors of a foreign corporation, which has its business office in this state, may maintain an action in equity in the courts of this state against resident officers of the corporation to recover, on behalf of the corporation, corporate moneys converted by such officers, as well as moneys lost to the corporation by their fraudulent and negligent conduct. This question must be answered in the affirmative.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ganzer v. Rosenfeld. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
Winslow, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a general demurrer to the complaint. The only serious question involved is whether stockholders and creditors of a foreign corporation, which has its business office in this state, may maintain an action in equity in the courts of this state against resident officers of the corporation to recover, on behalf of the corporation, corporate moneys converted by such officers, as well as moneys lost to the corporation by their fraudulent and negligent conduct. This question must be answered in the affirmative. It is doubtless true that the courts of a state will not assume to dissolve or regulate the internal affairs of a foreign corporation, — in other words, they will not exercise visitorial powers over such a corporation ; but they may and will, in a proper case, require an accounting and restoration of property and money misappropriated or wasted by unfaithful officers who are within their jurisdiction. Miller v. Quincy, 179 N. Y. 294, 72 N. E. 116; Richardson v. Clinton W. T. M. Co. 181 Mass. 580, 64 N. E. 400; 19 Cyc. 1236-1238.

By the Court. — Order affirmed.