Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

CHEMICAL REALTY CORP. v. TAXATION DIV. DIRECTOR, 6 N.J. Tax 448 (1984)

Chem. REALTY Corp., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-CROSS-APPELLANT, v.DIRECTOR, Div. OF Tax’n, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT., 6 N.J. Tax 448 (Tax Court of New Jersey. 1984)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1984-05-21
Topic: general

CHEMICAL REALTY CORP. v. TAXATION DIV. DIRECTOR, 6 N.J. Tax 448 (1984) CHEMICAL REALTY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-CROSS-APPELLANT, v.DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT.Tax Court of New Jersey.Submitted May 14, 1984. Decided May 21, 1984.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CHEMICAL REALTY CORP. v. TAXATION DIV. DIRECTOR, 6 N.J. Tax 448 (1984). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 1 opinion

CHEMICAL REALTY CORP. v. TAXATION DIV. DIRECTOR,6 N.J. Tax 448(1984)

CHEMICAL REALTY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-CROSS-APPELLANT, v.

DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Tax Court of New Jersey.

Submitted May 14, 1984.

Decided May 21, 1984.

Before Judges ARD, MORTON I. GREENBERG and TRAUTWEIN.Page 449

Appeal from the Tax Court.

Irwin I. Kimmelman,Attorney General, attorney for appellant-cross-respondent (James J. Ciancia,Assistant Attorney General, of counsel;Martin L. Wheelwright,Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).Pitney, Hardin, Kipp Szuch,attorneys for respondent-cross-appellant (Gerald C. NearyandStuart M.Feinblatt,on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment entered on May 27, 1983 is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Andrew's comprehensive opinion reported at5 N.J. Tax 581(Tax Ct. 1983).Page 450