Opinion · New Jersey Superior Court
Salsman v. NAT. COMMUNITY BANK OF RUTHERFORD
105 N.J. Super. 164
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New Jersey Superior Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1969-03-19
- Topic
- general
105 N.J. Super. 164 (1969) 251 A.2d 460 ELIZABETH A. SALSMAN (FORMERLY ELIZABETH A. ODGERS), INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR J. ODGERS, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Salsman v. NAT. COMMUNITY BANK OF RUTHERFORD. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 29 opinions
ELIZABETH A. SALSMAN (FORMERLY ELIZABETH A. ODGERS), INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR J. ODGERS, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
NATIONAL COMMUNITY BANK OF RUTHERFORD, A BANKING CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,
v.
HAROLD BRESLOW AND THE FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 10, 1969. Decided March 19, 1969.Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEWIS.
Mr. William R. Morrison argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd & Griggs, attorneys).
Mr. John R. Weigel argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. James L.R. Lafferty and James L. McKeon, Jr. of counsel; Messrs. Lafferty, Rowe, McMahon & McKeon, attorneys).
*165 PER CURIAM.
The judgment herein is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Botter in his opinion reported at 102 N.J. Super. 482 (Law Div. 1968).
Affirmed.