Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Welsh v. Potts

99 N.J.L. 528

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1924-04-11
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief Justice, Minturn, Kaijsctt, Black, Campbell, Gardner, Van Buskirk, JJ. 7. For reversal — Katzenbaci-i, Clark, JJ. 2.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Welsh v. Potts. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief Justice, Minturn, Kaijsctt, Black, Campbell, Gardner, Van Buskirk, JJ. 7.

For reversal — Katzenbaci-i, Clark, JJ. 2.