Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Board of Chosen Freeholders of Burlington v. White

Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Burlington v. White, 7 Gummere 251 (N.J. 1918)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Date: 1918-10-11
Topic: general

Pee Curiam. The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court. *253For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Board of Chosen Freeholders of Burlington v. White. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

*253 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.