Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
90 N.J.L. 672
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1917-10-11
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. Thé judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 7. For reversal—The Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Heppenheimer, JJ. 5.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
Thé judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 7.
For reversal—The Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Heppenheimer, JJ. 5.