Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Pacifico v. Carpenter Steel Co.

Pacifico v. Carpenter Steel Co., 135 N.J.L. 204 (N.J. 1947)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1947-01-17
Topic
general

*205 Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porskie in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Donges, Colie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McLean, JJ. 12. For modificaUon — Heher, McGeehan, JJ. 2.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pacifico v. Carpenter Steel Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

*205 Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porskie in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Donges, Colie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McLean, JJ. 12.

For modificaUon — Heher, McGeehan, JJ. 2.