Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Lisena
131 N.J.L. 39
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1943-11-04
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Bodine, Donges, Persiqe, Dear, Wells, JJ. 6. For reversal — Case, Heher, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 5.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Lisena. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Bodine, Donges, Persiqe, Dear, Wells, JJ. 6.
For reversal — Case, Heher, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 5.