Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Fleming v. McAteer

129 N.J.L. 96

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1942-09-18
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court. For affirmanc e—The Chancellor, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12. For reversal —None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Fleming v. McAteer. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmanc e—The Chancellor, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.

For reversal —None.