Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Atti
State v. Atti, 128 N.J.L. 318 (N.J. 1942)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1942-04-23
- Topic
- general
*319 Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Brogan. Since the assignment was abandoned in the Supreme Court, there is no occasion to consider whether in the circumstances there was error in overruling questions propounded to the accused as to the taking of “legal advice” respecting his right to vote; and the point is therefore reserved. For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Bodine, Donges, PIeher, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 11.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Atti. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Brogan.
Since the assignment was abandoned in the Supreme Court, there is no occasion to consider whether in the circumstances there was error in overruling questions propounded to the accused as to the taking of “legal advice” respecting his right to vote; and the point is therefore reserved.
For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Bodine, Donges, PIeher, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.