Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Dooley v. Roberson

Dooley v. Roberson, 124 N.J.L. 127 (N.J. 1940)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Date: 1940-01-25
Topic: general

Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court. For affirmance —The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Donges, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12. For reversal — Hbheb, J. 1.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dooley v. Roberson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance —The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Donges, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hbheb, J. 1.