Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Rybasack v. Prudential Insurance Co.

121 N.J.L. 583

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1939-01-13
Topic
general

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court by Judge Porter, sitting as Supreme Court commissioner. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, JJ. 11. For reversal — HEHER, PERSKIE, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 4.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rybasack v. Prudential Insurance Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court by Judge Porter, sitting as Supreme Court commissioner.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, JJ. 11.

For reversal — HEHER, PERSKIE, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 4.