Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Then
State v. Then, 119 N.J.L. 429 (N.J. 1938)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1938-01-26
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellob, Paekee, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, JJ. 9. For reversal — None.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Then. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellob, Paekee, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.