Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Bonamassa v. Davis

Bonamassa v. Davis, 118 N.J.L. 181 (N.J. 1937)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1937-04-30
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 15. For reversal — None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bonamassa v. Davis. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.