Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Merrill v. Winans
Merrill v. Winans, 116 N.J.L. 90 (N.J. 1936)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1936-01-31
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 10. For reversal — None.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Merrill v. Winans. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 7 opinions
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.