Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Clott v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
115 N.J.L. 114
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1935-05-17
- Topic
- general
Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Clott v. Prudential Insurance Company of America. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.