Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Giant Tiger Corp. v. Board of Commissioners

Giant Tiger Corp. v. Bd. of Comm’rs, 113 N.J.L. 34 (N.J. 1934)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Date: 1934-05-04
Topic: general

Pee Cueiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Hehee, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Dill, JJ. 10. For reversal — The Chief Justice, Peeskie, Deae, JJ. 3.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Giant Tiger Corp. v. Board of Commissioners. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Hehee, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Dill, JJ. 10.

For reversal — The Chief Justice, Peeskie, Deae, JJ. 3.