Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Sandler v. Hudson and Manhattan Railroad Company

108 N.J.L. 203

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1931-10-19
Topic
general

Pee Cueiam. The judgment herein is affirmed, by an equally divided court. For affirmance — Trenchard, Lloyd, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Dear, JJ. 6. For reversal — Parker, Case, Bodine, Daly, Hetfield, Wells, JJ. 6.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sandler v. Hudson and Manhattan Railroad Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
Pee Cueiam.

The judgment herein is affirmed, by an equally divided court.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Lloyd, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Dear, JJ. 6.

For reversal — Parker, Case, Bodine, Daly, Hetfield, Wells, JJ. 6.