Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.
105 N.J.L. 642
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1929-05-20
- Topic
- general
Pee Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion by Judge Dungan in the Circuit Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 8. For reversal — Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Van Buskiek, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 6.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion by Judge Dungan in the Circuit Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 8.
For reversal — Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Van Buskiek, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 6.