Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Okin v. Essex Sales Company

Okin v. Essex Sales Co., 104 N.J.L. 181 (N.J. 1927)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Date: 1927-10-17
Topic: general

Pee Cueiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — Paekeb, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbacii, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yak Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Okin v. Essex Sales Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Paekeb, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbacii, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yak Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.